CRYPTOCURRENCY

Metamask: Checking ERC721 token approvals in a for loop works in Hardhat Script but fails in React

×

Metamask: Checking ERC721 token approvals in a for loop works in Hardhat Script but fails in React

Sebarkan artikel ini

METAMASK problem: Verification of approval of Token ERC721 in Script Hardhat vs React

When working with Metamk API and solidity contracts, there are certain edge cases that can lead to unexpected behavior. A common problem is when tokens approvals are reviewed in ERC721 tokens using a for a brown script versus a React application.

In this article, we will explore the problem and provide solutions to solve it.

Hardhat script problem

In a hardhat script, you can use the transfer to transfer the property of a Token ERC721. When verifying Token’s approvals in these contracts that use a for loop, you can find problems with the approval status that is updated correctly.

`JavaScript

const contractrar = ['0x1234567890abcdef'];

Modifier is appropriate (address [] Contractrrar memory) {

REQUIRE (CONTRAT.LENGTH> 0, "zero length");

to (leave i = 0; i

const tokenaddress = contracting [i];

Contract [Tokenaddress] .Approve (direction.from, direction.value);

}

}

The problem lies in the fact that when a transfer is carried out using thetransfer, it returns 'true' immediately after processing the transaction. However, in a for loop, you must verify if the approval status has been updated correctly.

Reacting

In a ReACT application, verify tokens approvals in ERC721 tokens may be more complex due to the asynchronous nature of the so -called API.

JavaScript

Import {Contract} of './ Contracts/ erc721.sol';

Import web3 of 'web3';

const contractrar = ['0x1234567890abcdef'];

ISAPPROVED FUNCTION (address) {

const web3 = new web3 (window.ethereum);

Contract return.cc721.isapproved (contract.address, address.value);

}

In this example of reaction, theisaproveduses the object 'contract' of solidity contracts to verify if the token has been approved.

Solution

Metamask: Checking ERC721 token approvals in a for loop works in Hardhat Script but fails in React

To solve these problems both in scripts and react applications, you can use a different approach:

  • Use thetransfer ‘function with an event issuer : instead of verifying the approval status directly, use the event’ EventTransferompleteissued by Metamk's API to update the status of your contract.

JavaScript

const contractrar = ['0x1234567890abcdef'];

Modifier is appropriate (address [] Contractrrar memory) {

REQUIRE (CONTRAT.LENGTH> 0, "zero length");

to (leave i = 0; i

const tokenaddress = contracting [i];

EventTransferomplete (Tokenaddress) .emit ('approval', {status: True});

// Update the status of the contract

Contract [Tokenaddress] .Approve (direction.from, direction.value);

}

}

  • Use a call return function in thetransfer: a call back function to the 'transfer' event issued by MetamSK that will be called when the approval status is updated.

JavaScript

const contractrar = ['0x1234567890abcdef'];

EventTransferomplete (Tokenaddress) .on ('approval', (status) => {

if (status.status === True) {

// Update the status of the contract

contract [tokenaddress] .Approve (direction.from, direction.value);

}

});

By using these approaches, you can ensure that your contracts are verified for Token approvals correctly in both scripts and applications react.

Conclusion

When working with Metamk API and solidity contracts, it is essential to be aware of potential problems such as verifying tokens approvals in ERC721 tokens. By understanding the underlying mechanics of thetransfer ‘function and using event emitters or call return functions, you can solve these problems both in scripts and react applications.

ETHEREUM STORY PROBLEM

Baca Juga:  Bitcoin: What is this strange microtransaction in my wallet?

Tinggalkan Balasan

Alamat email Anda tidak akan dipublikasikan. Ruas yang wajib ditandai *